Europäische Sprachkritik Online (ESO)
EN

Here you will find the abstracts of the articles published in the Online Handbook. These articles discuss concepts that are inductively deduced from linguistic cultures and include fundamental language-critical topics such as “language criticism and language norms”, “language criticism and standardization”, “language criticism and language purism”, “language criticism and language institutions” as well as “language criticism and language ideologies”. You may access the comparative articles reflecting these topics by means of language comparisons and cultural comparisons (for German, English, French, Italian, and Croatian) via the tab “language criticism in European comparison”.

German English French Italian Croatian

Vol. 5 · 2025pp. 513–527

Language ideologies

Language Ideologies and Language Criticism in Croatian

Jadranka Gvozdanović, Cynthia Dyre

Abstract

In the development of the Croatian language, every modern-era phase has been shaped on a macro-level by ideology. During the Renais sance of the 16th century, in keeping with prevailing ideology, the regional language variants of the coastal regions of Dalmatia were elevated to the status of literary standard languages, thus establishing them as in digenous and equal in status to the other standard languages. The full range of variants was incorporated into the new literary language and were stylistically differentiated through their manner of usage. From the 16th century on, a Kajkavian dialectal literary language also emerged in the northwest. In later centuries, this became supra-dialectal, but re mained outside the standard established in the late 19th century, sub sequently appearing only sporadically. In the 16th century, a Chakavian literary language with dialectal variants emerged on the Adriatic coast. In the 17th century, the situation was quite different. At that time, the Chakavian and Shtokavian dialects, and later, also the Kajkavian dialect, including their various expressions, were considered components of a single language and bearers of the same supra-regional identity. Since that time, efforts have been made to unify the dialects, from Chakavian and Shtokavian to even a hybrid language devised by writers (members of the ‘Ozalj Circle’) in the west, on the Chakavian-Kajkavian-Shtokavian border. The notion of a common lexical system led to integrative diction aries and, occasionally, to hybrid grammatical solutions. Moreover, the language was standardised in the 17th century by order of Rome, as part of the Catholic Counter-Reformation. This expedient standard was not exactly inclusive; it was an abstract, historically and literarily reconstruct ed language standard that allowed variants to be used as equally valid options. This standard was created for the translation of biblical texts and was used to create and substantiate identity. At the beginning of the 19th century, the political and cultural ideology of the national language emerged as a new factor. Now, the preferred linguistic standard was no longer abstract, but anchored in the cultural history and political ideal of the nation-state. In the 20th century, the common language of the Croats and Serbs (ignoring the Bosnians, Herzegovinians and Montenegrins), which, to an extent, had been forcibly standardised, served the politi cal ideology of the multi-ethnic state that emerged following the First World War. It persisted under communism after the Second World War, until 1991. Since the late 1960s, single-language standardisation revivals, especially in Croatia, laid the groundwork for the national and linguistic ideology that ultimately led to the collapse of the multi-ethnic state of Yugoslavia. Post-Yugoslav language ideology can be traced back to the historically recognised roots of language, complementing the historically delineating construction of identity by differentiating it from competing variants.

Cite

Gvozdanović, Jadranka / Dyre, Cynthia (2025): Language Ideologies and Language Criticism in Croatian. In: Handbuch Europäische Sprachkritik Online (HESO), Vol. 5, pp. 513–527. DOI: 10.17885/heiup.heso.2025.5.25245

Vol. 4 · 2019

Language institutions

Language institutions and language criticism in Croatian

Petra Košutar, Lucia Miškulin Saletović

Abstract

This abstract and article are only available in German and Croatian.

Cite

Košutar, Petra / Miškulin Saletović, Lucia (2019): Language institutions and language criticism in Croatian. In: Handbuch Europäische Sprachkritik Online (HESO), Vol. 4. DOI: 10.17885/heiup.heso.2019.1.24086

Vol. 3 · 2018

Linguistic purism

Linguistic purism and language criticism in Croatian

Jadranka Gvozdanović, Iva Petrak

Abstract

This abstract and article are only available in German and Croatian.

Cite

Gvozdanović, Jadranka / Petrak, Iva (2018): Linguistic purism and language criticism in Croatian. In: Handbuch Europäische Sprachkritik Online (HESO), Vol. 3. DOI: 10.17885/heiup.heso.2018.0.23895

Vol. 2 · 2018

Standardisation

Standardisation and language criticism in Croatian

Jadranka Gvozdanović, Iva Petrak

Abstract

This abstract and article are only available in German and Croatian.

Cite

Gvozdanović, Jadranka / Petrak, Iva (2018): Standardisation and language criticism in Croatian. In: Handbuch Europäische Sprachkritik Online (HESO), Vol. 2. DOI: 10.17885/heiup.heso.2018.0.23872

Vol. 1 · 2017pp. 141–147

Language norms

Critique of language norms in Croatian

Jadranka Gvozdanović

Abstract

This abstract and article are only available in German and Croatian.

Cite

Gvozdanović, Jadranka (2017): Critique of language norms in Croatian. In: Handbuch Europäische Sprachkritik Online (HESO), Vol. 1, pp. 141–147. DOI: 10.17885/heiup.heso.2017.0.23721

Cooperation partners